|
| 
How do highway engineers decide
which road safety problems deserve attention first?
Clearly, data are needed to provide an objective basis for placing all roadway
trouble spots or hazardous conditions in some priority order. Below is the general
process by which highway engineers conduct highway safety improvements. You
need not learn all the details, but an appreciation for this process will help
you understand the way they set priorities and to work effectively with them.
What highway engineers
doThe pages that follow will show you how
the highway engineers prioritize road safety needs. For more complete information
on conducting a highway safety study see Local Highway Safety Studies User's
Guide available from the National Highway Institute, FHWA. Additional information
is also contained in the appendix.They typically follow the series of steps shown
below. -
Identify
hazardous location(s) and conditions. With the information you have collected
in your Road Problem Checklist, you can assist your community's transportation
professional in identifying hazardous locations. -
Conduct a highway safety
study. Once a particular hazardous location or condition has been identified,
a highway safety study is conducted. Supporting the completion of a safety
study by your local highway engineer is one of the best ways to ensure your trouble
spot or hazardous condition will be selected for attention. Here are the general
steps in conducting a highway safety study that highway engineers follow:
-
Collect and analyze preliminary
data. The type of data available on your trouble spot will be dependent on
the record keeping practices of local and state agencies. Primary data types include
police accident records, complaint files, and maintenance records. For more complete
information on conducting a highway safety study see Local Highway Safety Studies
User's Guide available from the National Highway Institute, FHWA. Additional
information is also contained in the appendix. -
Identify and collect field data. An initial
visit may be made to the trouble spot to identify possible safety deficiencies. -
Select and conduct appropriate
detailed studies. Highway professionals can conduct a range of studies depending
on the type(s) of problems encountered. Some of the types of technical studies
include traffic volume, sight distance, roadway and intersection capacity, and
speed of police and emergency services response to traffic incidents and response
time to clear hazardous operating conditions such as snow or ice. -
Evaluate study results.
The data from the site are analyzed and evaluated to identify safety deficiencies.
Results of the studies and field review activities are then integrated. -
Determine safety and operational
deficiencies. This step determines if the results of the studies support or
eliminate any of the possible safety deficiencies. A list of probable causes or
safety deficiencies is developed that will be used to identify appropriate countermeasures.
-
Identify
potential safety and operational improvement. The purpose of this step is
to develop candidate solutions to the safety deficiencies that are verified. See
Appendix for a chart of possible solutions to specific problems and types of crashes. -
Select appropriate improvements.
Decisions on the most appropriate countermeasures must be made recognizing the
many fiscal and political constraints within a community. Chapter 2 provides examples
of countermeasures to address nine potentially hazardous roadway conditions described
in this chapter. - Establish priorities for project or policy implementation.
This is the step in the overall process where the engineers juggle budget and
other factors in order to determine which of many projects to implement first.
In the real world where there may be dozens of important and worthy safety-related
road projects, priority choices must be made. Those projects that address a
well-documented need and have strong citizen support stand the best chance to
be implemented sooner rather than later.
- Schedule and implement
safety projects. As in the step above, it pays to keep informed and stay involved
with the process. It takes a lot of work and people to get from a project plan
to actual workers working on the roadway or retraining workers in highway operations
and maintenance. Be supportive and positive with the contacts you have made to
see that your priority project stays on track
-
Evaluate
safety improvements. Once the asphalt is laid, the guardrail fixed, or the
snow removal strategy refined, there is still work for you to do! Chances are
that the roadway problem you identified has been fixed, but only time will tell.
Over the next several years the roadway professionals will be evaluating the safety
improvements they have made to determine if the problem has been solved. So should
you as you drive through that former trouble spot. Keep in mind what made you
take action on the trouble spot originally. Was it crashes, traffic tie-ups, driver
behavior, or something else? Has there been a recurrence of hazardous operating
conditions? Have there been improvements? If not, now you know who to call!
The community
leader can play an important role in the last three steps of the Highway Safety
Study Process. By working constructively with the highway engineers, other road
professionals, and government leaders, you can influence the attention given to
your road problem and make it a higher priority. |